Is The Shining a Real Horror Film?

The Shining was an adaption from the Stephen King novel to film by Stanley Kubrick in 1980. The film redesigned the Horror genre and delved into the themes of violence, repetition, and reincarnation. Jack Torrance accepts a job to be a caretaker in the Overlook Hotel for the winter with nobody but his family around as the snow traps them at the hotel. He learns early on that the Hotel has a bloody history including one of the past caretakers loosing his mind and killing his family. The film is filled with foreshadowing. Jacks wife, Wendy, mentions the Donner Party on the drive to the hotel which creates the setting of isolation leading to brutality. Wendy also excitedly compares the Overlook to being like a ghost ship which sets up the presence of spirits in the film. The audience also learns that the hotel is built on an Indian burial ground which gives the Overlook a disturbing history that leads up to the violent and supernatural events that occur. Jack looses his mind pretty quickly into his stay at the hotel, and the audience starts to see him follow the tendencies of the past caretaker and it becomes apparent that the spirits of the hotel are convincing Jack to kill his family. The real antagonist of this film isn’t a living person, but the haunted hotel itself.

The shining was a new kind of horror film that Kubrick thought was going to be the scariest horror film ever made. Early reviews of the film didn’t agree that the film was even in the horror genre. The 1980 film comment by Richard T. Jameson only gives praise for Kubrick’s untraditional use of camera effects. Jameson loves how the use of the tracking method to follow characters around the hotel backed with a horrific soundtrack gives the film a suspenseful and terrifying feel, but he feels like the film didn’t do enough to live up to the title of the scariest horror film of all time.

In contrast, the film seems to have grown in popularity over the years to some. Roger Ebert’s 2006 review had nothing bad to say about the film. He explores the idea of which character’s perspective is most reliable, concluding that the chef, Dick, has the most trustworthy point of view, although he dies pretty quickly after returning to the Overlook. Ebert discusses the film’s ambiguity and different views on how the ending can be interpreted with Jack being shown in one of the hotel’s pictures from 1921. Was Jack reincarnated and drawn back to the Overlook to return to evil ways, or was the spirit of Jack absorbed into the hotel after his monstrosities? All in all he praises Kubrick’s film-making and story-telling.

Historically, the film was designed to call in fans of the Horror genre. The trailer of the film depicted only an elevator that eventually started gushing an enormous wave of blood onto the screen. This trailer depicted the film as being a terrifying nightmare, much scarier than it actually turned out to be. The marketing department that produced the trailer wanted to hype the audience up for a bloodbath, since that’s what brings viewers into a horror film, but the film itself didn’t live up to the shocking amount of blood in the trailer.

The poster that advertised the film shows a madman-looking Jack as if he just escaped from a psychiatric hospital and a terrified Wendy screaming in horror. The poster contributes to the theme of a horror-filled film. It portrays that the film will be filled with action and scream-curdling scenes. The poster even refers to the movie as the “tide of terror,” which the film does not live up to.
The film started out as a conventional film, but ended with a very unconventional ending. When Jack showed up in the picture from 1921, it left more questions than answers. The film had a budget of $19 million, and created a revenue of $44 million, so it made a huge impact on the public, but more so as the movie aged than when it was first released.

The Shining is definitely a film worth watching, although if you are looking for the scariest horror film in history, I would look elsewhere. After finishing the film at one o’clock in the morning, I was a little freaked out, looking for axe murders in my closet who weren’t there, but it didn’t provide the type of horror experience that the filmmakers and marketing team hyped it up to be. The film focused more on the character’s phycological reaction to the spirit of the overlook. We watched Jack become corrupted by the spirits. Another film that didn’t quite do justice to the novel, The Shining only has a place in history because of the film work by Kubrick, the amazing performance by Nicholson, and the haunting soundtrack that accompanies the film.

5 Comments

  1. Kristen says:

    Hi Kory!

    I also enjoy the shining but I don’t think it is very scary. I like how you stated that the antagonist of the story is the hotel. I found that very interesting. I often hear people say that Jack is the antagonist. I really liked all of the detail and how everything flowed in your blog. I am starting to get more detailed in my writing and now I want to start getting a more natural flow.

  2. Zhen-Liu says:

    Hey,
    I have the same feeling as you. I don’t think it is a traditional horror film. The artistic style of this film is quite unique. Instead of trying to attract viewers with his nauseous, blood-thirsty look, kubrick USES almost all the advanced art and technology to create a spooky atmosphere. Unlike our movie-watching experience, this one doesn’t take place in the narrow, dark environment of a typical horror film. Instead, it is set in a large hotel, and most of the plot takes place in normal light. It’s a challenge for the director for the audience and for himself. When you write a blog, you always come up with new ideas. I find it interesting to read your blog.

  3. Connor says:

    Hey Kory,

    Like you I also watched The Shining this week and reached similar conclusions. I do not believe it is a standard horror film and with all the hype and build up Kubrick was almost setting the audiences up for disappointment. It turned out to be a very good movie and I can see why it has retained it’s status as a classic. I did not know that the film took in $44 million at the box office. I admire you’re ability to debate a topic and for myself want to write more naturally.

  4. Sonja Marsh says:

    Hey Kory!
    i love that we did the same movie, it really seems as if The shining was one of the more popular choices for this week.
    i have to admit that i really enjoyed the fact that you seemed to use more actual literary devices in your blog. it really made the blog go from just writing about another movie that was watched to being a more meaningful piece of writing that had a very good point. you mentioned Dick being one of the more responsible one and i completely agree with you, he takes Denny under his confidence to let Denny know that he wasn’t alone with his gift of shining and i think that really helped Denny throughout the movie.

  5. Joei-Conwell says:

    Kory,

    Thanks for your write up on The Shining! I did not know that it was heavily marketed as a quintessential horror film but did not live up to expectations. I have always heard that it is a classic and very worth watching so I assumed that it was what it seemed to be which I supposed is a problem with making assumptions about Kubrick and King and work. I have not seen the film but could definitely see myself checking behind the curtains for an ax murderer as well. I really like your style of writing, it flows very well but is also not fluffed with extra meaningless words.

    Best Regards,
    Joei Conwell

Comments are closed.