The Shining – Not Shining Light on The Plot

When hearing about the opportunity to live in an isolated lodge in the middle of an uninhabited forest, twenty five miles away from the nearest town, in the midst of heavy winter –  the majority of us would instantly decline. Such was not the case for Jack Torrence, played by Jack Nicholson, in The Shining, the infamous horror film directed by cinematic genius, Stanley Kubrick.

The Overlook Hotel

The film deals with the effect of isolation, violence and disintegration of family in the midst of nothingness. But the themes of the film is not what makes it so interesting to analyze, rather it is the effect that the movie had on its viewers and critics when it came out and then decades later. Being one of the most controversial and misunderstood movie of all time, The Shining is an excellent example of a film being a form of art to express the director’s point of view of society, regardless if it is a best hit or not.

One of the main issues dealt in the movie is Jack’s descent into madness, which eventually causes him to want to murder his wife, Wendy, and their son, Danny. No one really knows what was the trigger that causes Jack to snap, but there is a variety of factors. He is a recovering alcoholic, he fell into what is known as Cabin Fever (a claustrophobic reaction that takes place when a person or group ends up in an isolated or solitary location, or stuck indoors in confined quarters for an extended period), or it could be the the location itself- The Overlook Lodge, which was built on top of a Native American Burial ground, and used various Native American art to decorate its interiors.

The Shining Apollo Room

Many have claimed it is the violence (and ultimately the massacre of the Native Americans) that most likely took place on the grounds of the Overlook hotel, that lead to the circle of violence to continue within its inhabitants.

But the issue is, is that no one knows which factor is considered more heavily. Kubrick designs his film in a way where everything and nothing is possible. This initially aggravated critics, but later exhilarated them, and caused them to reconsider their first response.

While it was released, critics gave the movie mostly negative reviews, Janet Maslin of the New York Times reported that “the supernatural story knows frustratingly little rhyme or reason […] Even the film’s most startling horrific images seem overbearing and perhaps even irrelevant” (Maslin, 1980). In fact, most reviews talked about Kubrick’s ambiguity and omitting important moments from the plot of the novel it was based on (Of the same name, by Stephen King).

Although I did not read the book, I could agree that throughout the film, there are moments that are unclear. Specifically the slow pace of the film that ends rapidly and without a proper conclusion: We never find out the true fate of Jack, and later see him on a framed picture on the hotel dated 1921.

 

This vagueness causes unease throughout the entire film.  The unease is only fueled further by the use of the music, switching between awkward moments of silence or static sound, followed by bursts of dramatic violin, indicating danger, and old fashioned singles, which stand alone, are quite pleasing, but put into the context of the film, creating an eerie sense, that whatever happened in the past of the hotel, will forever remain.  As put by Jeremy Barham, “the film’s musical sound world acts in many different ways as a potent aesthetic, intellectual and personal signifier of the very greatest and the very worst — the sublime, ridiculous and monstrous — of human culture and identity” (Berham). This style of music was wildly disapproved at the time, but is now the cornerstone for all horror movie soundtracks for its residual effects on the viewer.

Fast forward a couple of decades, and the reviews, just like the music in the film, took a sharp turn. With every screening of The Shining, the audience became more understanding of Kubrick’s intention, while still not understanding the plot of the movie, which was exactly the point!

Robert Ebert, the famous movie critic stated, “Stanley Kubrick’s cold and frightening The Shining challenges us to decide: Who is the reliable observer? Whose idea of events can we trust? […] It is this elusive open-endedness that makes Kubrick’s film so strangely disturbing” (Ebert).

This path of negatives to positive appreciation of the film is similar to what I felt after my viewing of the film. For full disclosure, I am not a horror movie watcher, and even used the occasional pillow during the film to conceal a scene that I thought freighting. However, upon finishing the film, I realized I used the pillow less than expected, or when I watch other horror films. So I initially, like the original critics disregarded the film.

But I found that every time I close my eyes the night after I watched the movie, I would get a sequence of scenes from the film. From the twins, appearing disfigured, to Jack’s frozen grinning body. And the realization that the film is unsolved is what kept me from falling asleep.

Jack's frozen body

I believe that was Kubrick’s intention.

After critically analyzing the movie, I have come to understand that every part of the film has no finite point, there is always a piece missing. From the actual screenplay to the theatrical poster release.

The actual screenplay, such as the infamous scene when Wendy finds Jack’s manuscript that repeatedly reads, “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy”, alluding to the well known proverb, with no known origin.

Finding the manuscript

Or the poster, which at first sight seems very bland, a simple yellow background and the writing of the film’s title. However once you begin to explore the reason for the poster choices, a larger picture emerges. According to color psychology, yellow signifies the color of “acquired knowledge, the color which resonates with the left or logic side of the brain stimulating our mental faculties and creating mental agility and perception” (Empower yourself color psychology). Within the movie it is the imagination, or loss of reality, of a Jack that results in the murderous plot of the movie. In addition we see a faint face in the poster, which could be the fear of a child (perhaps Danny, Jack’s son), or his wife, maybe it is The Shining itself, we will never know.

He twisted the classic phrase “Ignorance is bliss” into a sinister “Not knowing might get you killed”. As humans we are obsessed with trying to figure out all the events surrounding us, we crave gossip about anyone, follow the news, and socialize daily for multiple hours. Kubrick used our own instincts against us, and that is what makes this movie so incredible!

9 Comments

  1. Liam Dunne says:

    Hi Evita,
    you did an amazing job of reviewing this edgy movie with Jack Nicholson. From the various films I’ve seen Jack Nicholson in, this literally tops the cake with the amount of acting he did for his role. I wished he made various other roles being a serial killer in other films, because he has the look for it. Either way, thanks for your honest opinions and I think you nailed them spot on.

  2. Sydney says:

    Yes Evita! There are so many factors to take into consideration. That’s one of the things I really enjoyed about this movie. There are many reasons as to why a character chooses to do what they do. I like how even though it’s a lot to talk about you didn’t get muddled in explaining everything. I didn’t know the psychology behind the color yellow. It makes me wonder what a person’s favorite color says about that person. I really enjoyed reading your post!

  3. Tim says:

    Hi Evita,

    Like you, I also reviewed and greatly enjoyed “The Shining”. It’s interesting to learn about how you were much more heavily affected by the horrifying visuals, as I was more centered on Jack’s lunacy. These kind of personal feelings derived from a film is something I often omit from my writing, and would like to incorporate within the future. Good stuff!

  4. Elise Settle says:

    I agree with your thoughts on the film, it really was very confusing at times. I did not previously know that the director planned the film out to such a degree. Your use of several screenshots throughout the post was useful, and helped to create a more friendly reading environment.

  5. T.B Todd says:

    Evita,
    You did an excellent job on desiring and reviewing the film. It really helped explain the uneasiness and the reason behind what makes it so scary. There is nothing more terrifying than the unknown. I loved your use of photos, I didn’t even notice them until the end yet they helped with making your point clear. Thanks to those images, even those who have not seen the film can understand your review.

  6. Ivy Alvarez says:

    Hi Evita,
    You did a brilliant job at explaining the plot–had I never watched it before I would’ve been able to put the pieces together just but reading your exposition–very thoughtful. I hope to be as concise as you are in this wee’s upcoming post. The last portion of your essay where you brought in color psychology was unique and an interesting touch, well done.

  7. Samuel Smith says:

    You have a very detailed and organized post about the plot of the movie i also love the graphics as well. If id have never seen the movie before I would understand whats it’s about after reading this post.

  8. Owen Slater says:

    Evita,
    I’ve still never seen this movie but always wanted to, and your description wants me to see it even more now! I never knew how the movie never gave the audience a real sense of what the plot was, which I thought was interesting. I really liked your essay layout and organization, something that I hope to do in my writing next time.

  9. Jake McKinley says:

    Evita,

    I agree that the vagueness adds an eerie feeling. Your description of the film portrays that and the theme of an artistic perspective. I admire how you saw in depth the meaning of this film. I agree with you that at first the movie would seem to warrant negative reviews, as it is unclear and fails to have proper closure or clarification. The thought-provoking aspect is not something I often watch movies for so I would likely not enjoy this at first.

Comments are closed.