Original Comedy: at it’s Finest

The Movie Young Frankenstein directed by Mel Brooks in 1974 is an adaptation of the famous Frankenstein novels written by author Mary Shelly decades before. The story of Frankenstein had come to her in a dream at a very young age, little did she know her story would be told over and over in many different ways for years to come. Just a few months before releasing Young Frankenstein, Mel Brooks and famous actor Gene Wilder saw great success with a comedy film called Blazing Saddles. They loved working with each other and on a quick whim decided to create the parody film Young Frankenstein. Gene Wilder came up with the idea to turn this fimiliar story into a comedy, and along with Brooks’ agent, had to convince him to direct it. Mel Brooks exclaimed that he would only do it if the movie was filmed in “Black and White,” even though studios at that refused to do so because they thought the audience wouldn’t receive it well. With new technology available to bring color to the screen, it seems like a retrograde thing to do. Brooks wanted to make a joke out of the old “mad scientist” movies, so his point was to use satire in every way possible. He created the atmospheres of an old movie by doing this and also used similar scene transitions like “iris outs,” “wipes,” and fades to black. A popular site called TVTropes that describes itself as a “pop culture wiki” page says “The effect originates from the early filming technique of shrinking the physical iris of the camera to film closing shots. At some point, this became so cliche that variations and parodies were inevitable.”  (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IrisOut#) Using these techniques along with exaggerated character roles really allowed the audience to enjoy this movie as one that was making fun of old steryoptypes. You can see in the following screenshot from the film how the “scientist” and “monster” relationship was overdone and made to be funny.  Here Gene Wilder, acting as the scientist, is passionately gripping his monster in the face probably exclaiming something about how proud he was to have made this creature. The monster, Frankenstein, has a huge head with scars, is partially bald and has messy hair. He’s looking off into space like he’s not fully aware of what’s happening, foreshadowing the havoc he would create when he escaped from the grips of the scientist and was off on his own. It evokes laughter just looking at the shot because it was such a common them/story line in earlier horror films and now we can just laugh at that since film makers have become much more creative with horror plots since then. This shows me that this movie was an example of how filming is a form of art and a way for directors or actors to express themselves. Sure, it made the people involved a lot of money, but they wanted to do it because it was in their character to do so and they wanted to entertain people with their goneuine and authentic work. In this case the form of art being carefully crafted comedy. I think this film was also influenced by the new and emerging culture and politics of its time. The new wave of feminist movement was gaining momentum and people we’re talking about breaking down gender roles. In 1970, Gloria Steinem, a writer for New York magazine published an article in TIME magazine called “If Women Were to Win” and said, “Schools and Universities will help to break down traditional sex roles, even when paretns will not. Half the teachers will be men, a rarity now… girls will not necessarily serve cooked or boys hoist up the flag.” (http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,876786,00.html) This shows how new ideas about gender roles we’re already changing and becoming mainstream, and it reflects on Mel Brooks use of satire for the female characters in Young Frankenstein. The female characters are overly sexualized, either in the shadow of a man or very vain. This is done so in such an overt way that it is clearly making fun of these gender roles and shows how ridiculous it was for women to be seriously cast to act this way in older films. Some may even see the satire in the film, as it applies to gender roles, as a progressive form of comedy and political expression. Sometimes comedy is the best way to get people to be open minded for change. Other reviews on the film repeatadly talk about how much fun the cast and crew reportedly had making this move and how that bleed through to the audience, adding to the enjoyment of the movie. For example, a review analyzing why this movie was so funny explains that “When principle photography for the film was winding down, the cast and crew were having so much fun, director Brooks actually wrote some extra scenes, just so filming wouldn’t have to come to an end.” (http://www.neatorama.com/2012/08/02/mel-brooks-comic-masterpiece-young-frankenstein/) I thought it great to know that this movie brought joy to not only the audience but also everyone involved. Young Frankenstein IS a genuine and timeless masterpiece. 

 

4 Comments

  1. Dallas Moree says:

    Hey, when reading through your post I really liked how you tied Mel Brooks and Gene wilder in there in a couple different spots, also bringing up related comedies by Brooks. I also thought your description of the film was pretty solid and gave me enough knowledge to describe the film to someone else. This connected to some of my writings because I also have submissions with Mel Brooks and also did an assignment on Blazing Saddles. Something I’ll do in my future post will be making it longer. I feel that yours has a lot of information but it is all important things.

  2. Aisha Oliver says:

    Hi Sofia,
    I am a sucker for anything involving Gene Wilder. Who doesn’t love a little Willy Wonka in their day? Your coverage of how the film was influenced by current events happening at the time of production, as well as your breakdown of gender roles within media, only served to enhance the essay’s overall composition. I had not previously thought of delving so deeply into world affairs when discussing my past film choices, and now I certainly will be making more of an effort to truly understand the dynamics behind a film’s creation. Overall you did a great, thorough job.

  3. Caitlyn Bidart says:

    Hi Sofia, I have never watched Young Frankenstein so it was great reading your post. I find it kind of cool that the story of Frankenstein came to Mary in a dream. I liked how you gave background on the director. I enjoyed learning that Mel Brooks had to convince and force the studio to allow him to direct the film in black and white. They didn’t want it filmed in black and white because they didn’t know how the audience would react to it. Also, to be honest, I didn’t realize that it was meant to be a comedy. If I were to give any advice it would be to change the large URL to a link that looks more normal. You gave a lot of information as to the background and history of what went on during the time the film was made. It was very informational.

  4. Melisa Ensign says:

    Hi Sophia,
    I wrote about Young Frankenstein last week and really liked your view on the movie. You made a great point to point to point out the book by Mary Shelly and how her story was told in different ways throughout the years. I also like the description of the way the movie was filmed. You mentioned the film transitions, like shrinking the iris which I was unaware of, I will check out TV Tropes website. The old movie filming techniques were very interesting and I’m hoping to find more info on filming techniques for my future posts. I also like that you posted how Mel Brooks Sexualizes the female characters to show how women would not be playing these roles in a older movie, in the movie, I noticed but didn’t even think to point this out in my post.

Comments are closed.